Monthly Archives: September 2015

More WEP Candidates Dropped From Ballot

Matthew Hamilton reports in the Times Union:

“Three more would-be Women’s Equality Party candidates are being kept off the party’s line on the November ballot under a ruling issued by a state Supreme Court justice in Albany on Wednesday.

Justice Richard Platkin, who kept two candidates off the party’s ballot line in a pair of decisions issued Tuesday, ruled Wednesday that a trio of candidates for state Supreme Court justice cannot hold the line. As in his Tuesday rulings, Platkin tossed the candidates’ nominations on a technicality: That party officials did not submit a proper affidavit necessary to accompany the candidates’ nominating paperwork.”

Additional updates to today’s story can be accessed here.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Another Loss for Women’s Equality Party But One Candidate Gets To Stay On Ballot

In yet another courtroom fight over the WEP, an Albany candidate was also knocked off the ballot yesterday. Matthew Hamiltin reports about it here. The Albany County decision can be accessed below.

From the Albany opinion, “if one of the competing groups has secured the support of at least one of the statewide candidates while other contenders have none, then it has the ability to nominate candidates for office — even if the larger question of party control remains unresolved.”

Willingham 4583-152015-09-29-120458

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Future Still Unclear for Women’s Equality Party

Politico NY’s Bill Mahoney provides an update on the most recent court battles over the Women’s Equality Party. According to Mahoney, “these decisions seemingly portend bad news for candidates hoping to receive the WEP’s line in 2015. Numerous suits have sprung up in recent months arguing that Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s rules for the party he founded were invalid because they had the support of only two of the four statewide candidates who received its line last year rather than the “majority” required by election law. Both former state senator Cecilia Tkaczyk and a group of Republican county legislative clerks argued that they had just as much authority to endorse candidates.

In decisions affecting races in Albany, Warren County, and the Southern Tier, judges ruled Tuesday against candidates hoping to receive the WEP’s line this year. Acting Supreme Court Justice Richard Platkin specifically enjoined the board from “printing and placing the name of Barbara Fiala” on the ballot under the WEP line this year. Fiala, who is campaigning for a vacant Binghamton-area Senate seat, was briefly the WEP’s chair under Cuomo’s rules.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Schneiderman, State AGs, File Brief In Evenwel Redistricting Case

As first reported here last Friday, NY Attorney General Eric Schneiderman was joined by 20 other state Attorneys General in an amicus brief in the  Evenwel v. Abbott redistricting litigation pending before the US Supreme Court.

Today, Colby Hamilton (in a firewalled NY Politico article) and Nick Reisman (in NY State of Politics) cover the amicus brief filing.

If the petitioners are successful, Evenwel would have a dramatic impact on New York State, shifting State Assembly and Senate districts from downstate to upstate and shifting districts in communities with more children and minorities around within jurisdictions.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Fiala Kicked Off WEP Ballot Line

Nick Reisman reports in NY State of Politics that  “Democratic Senate candidate Barbara Fiala was kicked off the Women’s Equality Party ballot line on Tuesday, dealing a blow to her effort to flip the Southern Tier-based district long held by Republicans.

State Supreme Court Judge Richard Platkin ruled on Tuesday that Fiala, a former chairwoman of the party, stems from a technicality in the filing certification for the nomination.”

A copy of the court decision is linked in the article and available here:

VanSavage 4596-152015-09-29-102100

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

New York State’s Voting Laws Hurt Anti-Establishment Candidates

Peter Ryan, a student at Columbia University, has a column in the Buffalo News  discussing the difficulty of how New York’s election laws “successfully stifle voter turnout for…. atypical presidential candidats” and urges the “state Board of Elections (to) act immediately to contact the nearly 3 million voters that this (registration) deadline impacts, and to change the content of its website to clearly reflect all pertinent deadlines. The State Legislature should then act to substantially alter these outrageous deadlines for future elections. Voting is, after all, a right and responsibility of U.S. citizens, and a hallmark of democracy itself.”

He also adds “according to public records, there are over 2.75 million non-Republican, non-Democratic voters in New York State. The majority of these are non-affiliated voters (2.2 million) and Independents (430,000). It is completely reasonable to think that of these non-affiliated voters, some will be wooed and won over by Trump’s promise to “make America great again.” It’s also completely reasonable to think that some of the 430,000 Independents will want to vote for Sanders, the Independent senator from Vermont who is running on the Democratic ticket. As a matter of fact, in such an unconventional election, it’s likely that even some Republicans and Democrats will want to switch parties.

Here’s the good news: These voters still have time – the deadline is not until Oct. 9. Here’s the bad news: Of those nearly 3 million voters, few will have the opportunity to switch their enrollments to their new party of preference by the deadline.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

20 States Join NY in Evenwel Redistricting Amicus Brief; NYC Also Files

20 states joined an amicus brief  authored by the New York Attorney General’s Office in the Evenwel v. Abbott redistricting case pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. The case challenges the use of total population for redistricting. The New York City Corporation Counsel also filed a separate brief on its own. We will have more commentary on these briefs later.

Both briefs can be read here:

14-940 bsac The States

14-940_bsac_New York City

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized